July 14th, 2010

Creating Honors Programs that are Attractive to Prospective Students

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

Honors Programs can be beneficial to institutions in a variety of ways.  They can be useful in attracting high-ability students.  They can be effective in increasing enrollment and can improve retention rates.  Honors Programs can raise the academic discourse on campus and can even challenge faculty and staff in positive ways.  Many colleges and universities have Honors Programs but few are structured in a manner that make them very attractive to prospective students.

More... There are several things that administrators should avoid when introducing or upgrading their Honors Programs:
· Do not set the standards too high for your particular institution.  While a minimum ACT score of 27 might be fine for an institution that averages a score of 23, it may be unrealistic for a college with an ACT average of 19.
  · Do not require interviews with candidates.  Interviews can be intimidating and may dissuade qualified candidates.  Reasonable decisions about eligibility for an Honors Program can be made by reviewing standardized test scores and high school grade point averages.  If necessary, a review of a high school transcript is always an option.
· Do not require written recommendations.  I have always believed that recommendations were dubious.  Students are unlikely to submit recommendations from individuals that will not support their candidacy and poor recommendations are always dicey in this litigious society.
· Make offers of admission to your Program on a rolling basis if general admission offers are made on the same timetable.  Making prospective candidates wait until the Spring semester makes no sense if you wish to use the Honors Program to enhance recruitment.
· It is not necessary to have separate applications for the Honors Programs.  Qualified students can be identified during the general admission process and offered a chance to participate upon acceptance to the college or university.
· Separate essays should not be required.  A review of the high school transcript and standardized test scores provides sufficient data on writing skills.
Attractive Honors Programs include attributes which are focused on privileges and activities that are desired by students:
· Include a research opportunity with a faculty member.
· Allow for special participation in select campus events such as opportunities to meet and eat with guest speakers on campus.
· Find a way to include even a short international travel experience.  While such activities can be expensive, you might be able to identify a Board member or foundation willing to assist with the cost.
· Including specific mentoring opportunities with faculty is imperative.  Consider compensating faculty for making time for mentoring.  Compensation may even be an option for the previously suggested research participation opportunity.
· A nominal scholarship is appropriate.  Often administrators believe that extremely large awards or even full scholarships are necessary to attract students into Honors Programs.  My experience has been quite the opposite.  The attractiveness of an Honors Program is less about the money and more about the experience.
· Structure your program in a manner that builds resumes for participants.  A co-curricular transcript upon graduation can be an attractive bonus.
· Include a chance for independent study in areas of interest to the student.
· Activities involving service are becoming more popular.
· Make sure that your Program includes direct assistance for students interested in pursuing graduate study.  You may even wish to provide a chance for guaranteed acceptance into your graduate offerings if certain conditions are met.
· Expand the number of campus administrators involved in creating or up-grading the Honors Program.  Key faculty should obviously be involved, but the opinion of others is just as important.  Include the Chief Enrollment Officer to ensure the Program is competitive in the market.  The Financial Aid Director can assist in creating a nominal and affordable scholarship component.  Someone from the Development Office might assist in identifying sources of funding for desired initiatives.  Assistance from the Career Planning Office can help build the resume component and offer ideas that would be attractive to prospective employers.  An individual involved in Graduate Admissions can discuss what constitutes meaningful assistance for students interested in graduate degrees and can discuss ideas for guaranteed admission if your institution has graduate offerings.
So many Honors Programs are designed only by faculty members and they sometimes reflect the wants of the faculty rather than the needs of the students.  If you have an Honors Program, it is a good time to re-evaluate it.  If you do not have an Honors Program, it is a good time to design one.

July 13th, 2010

Responding to Cutbacks in State Grant Programs

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

 

The poor economy is challenging for colleges and universities in many ways.  This has been a particularly difficult year for financial aid as states eliminate or reduce state grants.  Colleges and universities need to develop plans for dealing with reductions in state grants as this trend is likely to continue over the next several years.

Some states are reducing commitments to state grants by making application deadlines earlier.  This has the political advantage of keeping award amounts level, while guaranteeing that overall expenditures will be reduced.  Fortunately for colleges and universities, much can be done to mitigate the impact of changes in deadlines.  Financial Aid Offices can be charged with making sure that students do not miss the deadlines.  It is easy to track currently enrolled students who have been eligible for state grants in the past.  The key is to take extraordinary measures to make sure these students apply for financial aid in time to meet new deadlines.  This involves much more than just sending a letter or making an announcement in the school newspaper.  All available communication mechanisms should be utilized to communicate with students and their families to encourage early application.  Institutions must take full responsibility for ensuring state grant deadlines are met.  The implications for retention and cash flow are serious. This is the only scenario where the institution has a significant level of control.

Often, state grant reductions are achieved by cutting award amounts across the board.  This creates a more difficult challenge for colleges and university leaders.  There are several possible approaches:

· The institution can just ignore the state grant reductions in the packaging strategy and assume that students and their families will be able to cover the shortfall.  Such an approach maximizes net revenue for the college or university.  While this can be a reasonable approach if the reductions are small, it may not be if the cuts amount to $500 or more.  Shifting the reduction to the student and family may have negative implications for both recruitment and retention.

· Some · Some schools elect to cover the entire shortfall with institutional aid funds.  This is no doubt the best option for supporting recruitment and retention efforts.  The problem is that many institutions simply cannot afford to absorb the extra expense.

· Other schools elect to replace a set portion of the shortfall.  For example, institutional leaders may decide to cover 50% of the state grant reduction for all eligible students.  While this option is definitely fair, it may not be the best choice for many schools.

· Colleges and universities sometimes set aside a pool of institutional funds and allow these funds to be awarded to students whose state grants were reduced at the discretion of the Director of Financial Aid.  In such a scenario, the Director allocates the limited funds on those students with the greatest financial need.

· Using an appeal process is another option.  Under this strategy, institutional representatives do not replace cuts in state grants as new and returning students are packaged.  Additional funding is only considered on a case-by-case basis upon appeal.

There are no right or wrong answers.  The goal is to make the right choice for your particular institution.  This is a decision that should not be made by the Financial Aid Office alone.  At minimum, the Director of Financial Aid, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Enrollment Officer, the Chief Retention Officer and the Director of Admission should be involved in the decision-making process.  It is never too early to begin these important discussions.  Cuts in state grants are likely to get even worse before they get better and do not be surprised if some states eliminate their higher education scholarship and grant programs altogether in the next few years.

July 12th, 2010

Establishing Fourth Quarter Enrollment Priorities

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

 There are only a couple months left before the start of another school year and much to be done. 
1. How many of your admission applicants and returning students have yet to apply for financial aid?  Given the state of the economy, it is time to take extra measures to ensure all of these students apply for aid and are awarded before the end of August.  Think about telephone outreach campaigns and special mailings.  Text messaging and social networks can also be effective.

More...2. How many of your admission applicants and returning students have been awarded financial aid but are still missing required documents?  Again, additional steps can still be taken to ensure financial aid folders are complete before the start of classes.  Recall that incomplete folders delay aid disbursements and can negatively impact cash flow.
3. This is probably the last chance to secure registrations for continuing students who have not completed course schedules for the next term.  Proactively contacting these students will be more effective than relying on them to contact their academic advisors.
4. How about fourth quarter outreach to your most at-risk population of returning students?  Rising sophomores are the least likely to return.  While everyone is busy this time of year, you might want to establish a priority to contact all of these students by telephone just to welcome them back in the month of July.  If there are problems, you still have a little time to resolve issues so they will re-enroll.
5. Have your Business Office personnel identified all the students with outstanding balances and made serious attempts to contact these students over the summer?  There is still time.  You may want to involve representatives from the Financial Aid Office in case solutions can be found by increasing eligibility for additional loans and grants.
6. Have representatives from the Academic division made every effort to work with students struggling with academic progress issues?  Sometimes students get into trouble and do not really understand that there may be opportunities for appeal.
7. Do you have active admission applicants whose admission folders are still incomplete?  If you are still accepting students for Fall 2010, you may want to follow up with these students immediately so they still have a chance to be accepted and enroll.
Time is running out, but much can be accomplished in the last two months.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 

July 11th, 2010

Considerations in Selecting a New Chief Enrollment Officer

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

 

Filling a new vacancy for chief enrollment officer can be a difficult task.  Many college and university Presidents simply do not have significant experience in issues related to recruitment, retention and financial aid.  Campus search committees are often comprised of individuals with limited knowledge regarding enrollment management.  The following are some suggestions that can be useful in selecting the right candidate for your school:

Look for a track record of success.

This seems so simple.  It is so obvious.  You would be surprised, however, in how often previous success is not a major requirement.  Have the candidate describe the challenges and objectives faced at the previous institution.  What were the outcomes?  How were the goals achieved?More...

It is often helpful to find candidates from similar institution types.

While enrollment officers from public institutions can certainly serve at private institutions and vice versa, it can be beneficial to avoid steep learning curves.  The difference between a large community college and a small private institution are considerable.  Moving from a private college or university to a for-profit can be difficult.  Again, no candidate should be excluded based on experience at a different institution type, but the transition challenges should not be ignored.

Take demographics into account.

Institutional location is important.  A potential enrollment officer from a school located in a densely populated area may not necessarily be appropriate for a college located in a rural area.  Recruitment success in Los Angeles, California does not necessarily set the stage for success in Edmond, Oklahoma.

Real experience in financial aid is a huge benefit.

Financial aid is more important than ever for recruitment, retention and net revenue.  As the economy sours and state grants stagnate and decline, a chief enrollment officer who really understands financial aid issues, packaging strategies and regulations can be an extraordinary asset.  The truth is that most enrollment management leaders still come from the admission profession rather than financial aid.  Experience “supervising” the financial aid division does not necessarily ensure adequate knowledge of financial aid.

Ask about discount rates.

Discount rates can vary a great deal from one institution to another.  Do not be afraid to ask about the discount rate at the candidate’s previous college or university.  An enrollment officer used to discounting tuition by 65% may have a hard time adjusting to a school that cannot afford a discount rate over 45%.

Compare budget and resources.

Success at a previous institution is not enough.  Sometimes there are huge differences in divisional budgets and available resources.  Some schools, for example, spend millions of dollars every year on marketing and advertising.  Many small colleges and universities do not have marketing budgets at all or the available funds are extremely limited.  Being realistic about resources available at a previous school and being honest about the resources that will be available at your school can benefit potential candidates and your institution.

Don’t be afraid to ask for help.There are a number of firms that specialize in assisting colleges and universities in making the right selection.  If you do not have sufficient expertise on your campus to make an informed decision, get help.

July 10th, 2010

Roosevelt University’s Growth Spurs A New Academic Offering, Co-Curricular Program Expansion and a New Educational Tower

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

Colleges and universities often seek to attract and retain more students.  Higher enrollments can generate more revenue, increase diversity, foster improved academic quality and change the campus dynamic.  There is, however, so much more that growth can mean to an institution.
Enrollment has increased significantly at Roosevelt University in Chicago in recent years.  The gains are fueling additional positive changes at the institution.  More traditional-aged undergraduates and a higher percentage of resident students have resulted in a major change in student activities.

More...

 

The University fielded athletic teams between 1948 and 1989.  Over the years, student interest in athletics waned and the University dropped varsity athletics at the end of 1989.
Athletic competition begins again at Roosevelt University this Fall as the Lakers return.  The University will participate in NAIA athletics and will have teams competing in men’s and women’s cross country, men’s and women’s tennis, men’s and women’s basketball and baseball.
Current plans include expansion to five additional sports over the next two years and the University has even introduced a new logo!
The physical plant is going to change dramatically.  Ground was recently broken on the construction of a new education building at a cost of $118 million.
· The new building will be located on South Wabash Avenue.
· At thirty-two stories and 469 feet high, it will become the second tallest higher education tower in the United States and the sixth tallest in the world.
· The new academic edifice will include classrooms and state-of-the-art biology and chemistry labs.
· The top seventeen floors of the glass and steel tower will provide upscale student housing for 600, with stunning views of the city and unobstructed views of Lake Michigan.
· Students will not even need to venture outside during the cold Chicago winters, as the complex will be linked to the University’s historic Adler & Sullivan Auditorium.
· The building includes a new student union along with meeting places for student clubs and organizations.
· The structure includes a dining hall and fitness facility.
· The Offices of Admission, Financial Aid and the Registrar will be housed in the new facility.
It is anticipated that construction will be completed in approximately two years.
Change includes expansion of the academic program as well.  Roosevelt University hopes to enroll its first class in a new professional program in Pharmacy.  The University will introduce a new academic offering for a Doctor of Pharmacy next year.
Enrollment growth can fuel exciting changes.  At Roosevelt University, growth is proving to be no less than transformational.
 

June 8th, 2010

How to Select a Financial Aid Processing Consultant

Carmen Afghani
Consultant
Financial Aid Services

 

Webster defines consultant as “to seek the opinion or advice of another person for making a decision.” Many people are randomly using the moniker “Consultant,” but hiring one to assist with financial aid processing should be approached with as much caution, prudence and research as selecting an attorney or even surgeon. Selecting the right consultant can add untold value to your Financial Aid Office and yield a substantial return on your investment.

For the purposes of this article, “Consultant” can refer to either an individual consultant or a consulting firm.

Determining Your Needs - One of the first steps in deciding upon a consultant is to ask yourself what are you trying to accomplish? Is it:

-to fill a temporary financial aid vacancy?

-to fix a financial aid process that is broken?

-to improve a financial aid process that’s OK but could be better?

-to lend expertise during periods of planned expansion or major system implementation?

-to help during an unexpected crisis?

When you have a clearly-defined goal of what you wish to accomplish, then it will become easier to find a consultant who is the rightfit. For example, if your office will undergo a major system implementation, your consultant should be an expert in your chosen information system (i.e., Banner, PeopleSoft, etc.).

Check References - Specifically, ask for references forwork done that is similar to your needs. For example, if you need to revamp your back office operations, you would not want someone who has never dealt with the operations aspect of a financial aid office.

Ask the reference if they were satisfied with the consultant’s work. Check more than one or two references if possible, as different offices may have had different experiences. One suggestion is to check references not necessarily on the reference list. Check the consultant’s track record: how long is their client list?

Check the US Department of Ed Website - For individuals who are prohibited from working with Title IV or other federal programs. Additionally, check with your State agency and USDOE regional staff.

Check Insurance Coverage – Consultants actually processing financial aid must have insurance to cover their errors. A mistake in verification can mean a student is no longer eligible, and all of the money must be repaid. Errors in financial aid can quickly add up to literally millions of dollars.

Check Audits - It is a federal requirement that consultants who process any financial aid files must have their work audited annually. Check for audits over the past few years and the audit results.

Interview the Candidates You Are Considering as Consultants - Personally interview the candidates, either by phone or, preferably, in person. Pick a consultant with whom you feel comfortable. You may be spending a lot of time with this person, so choosing a consultant with whom you can communicate in an open and straightforward manner is important to the success of the project.

If you are contacting a consulting firm, ask to speak to the specific consultant who will be assigned to your project. Ask the candidate pointed questions, especially specifics of your particular needs. For example, if you need a consultant to come in and train your staff, you would find out about the consultant’s experiences with training techniques and their knowledge of Title IV programs.

Does the candidate actually listen to your concerns and assess your needs or do they convey a know-it-all, arrogant attitude? If the latter is true, it’s time to find another consultant.

Standardized vs. Customized – The size of the firm can make a difference in your selection. Very large firms usually specialize in standard processes. For example, a system implementation usually involves a standard, often-repeated process that has a defined beginning and end procedure. These firms usually have a preferred methodology, however, and provide limited flexibility and adaptability.

On the other hand, smaller firms are usually best at custom assignments where analysis and problem-solving is involved. They are usually better able to select a consultant whose expertise and personality is best suited for the assignment. In a small firm, it is not unusual to deal directly with the owner or CEO, thereby providing better customer service to the client.

Other Important Considerations - Is the consultant committed for the long term? A consultant who will stay involved during the entire project is worth more than one who will quickly disengage. After the contract has ended, will you be able to contact the consultant to ask questions at no additional charge? There may be some loose ends after the consultant leaves, and a desirable firm will allow you to follow up without an extra charge.

What is the consultant’s knowledge of financial aid? How long have they worked in financial aid? Have their skills been assessed? How knowledgeable is the consultant working with your college about your type of institution and automated system? For example, if you are a public, 2-year community college using Datatel, do they have that type of background or are they from a large 4-year private university using Banner?

Will the consultant fit in with the group and with the culture of your organization? The consultant will be an integral part of your team, so the ability to be a team player, establish rapport and trust is essential. A good question to ask is, “describe what a good working relationship looks like to you.”

Is the consultant or firm involved with professional associations and/or community activities, such as helping colleges after Hurricane Katrina, flooding, fires or tornadoes? Is the consultant or firm actively involved with the National Associationof Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA) and otherstate or regional organizations?

In summary, choosing the best consultant for your need requires the same consumer savvy as any other major investment and warrants the same attention you would give when selecting any other professional service.

May 26th, 2010

Taking Adult Learner Retention to the Next Level

John Hall
Chief Executive Officer
Greenwood & Hall
The National Center for Education Statistics predicts that there will be just under 7 million adult learners by 2013. The growth of programs that cater to non-traditional students has been no less than explosive. Despite the vast financial resources that both institutions and the federal government have invested in continuing education programs, graduation rates have remained alarmingly low. As the number of adult learners continues to grow and Washington calls for increased accountability in terms of the outcomes
institutions provide for their students, schools must take a fresh look at creative approaches to improving retention.

Keep reading →

May 26th, 2010

Controlling Tuition Discounting By Leveraging Private Loans

Micharl O’Grady
Overture Technologies

There has been much discussion over the last two years about financial aid offices maintaining a “preferred lender list” for their students and families. Back in the 1980’s when many colleges and universities did not recommend specific lenders, schools would get student loan checks from credit unions, community banks and some large regional lenders. The processes were painfully slow and the cash flow was spread out over months.

With the advent of better technology and sweeping standardization, schools in the mid 1980’s could start transmitting student loan data electronically and receive the funds through electronic fund transfer (EFT)—vastly increasing the turnaround time and cash flow. As a result, financial aid offices started to recommend those lenders that created the least amount of work for their offices and met the customer service demands of their students and families.

In the 1990’s, when the technological playing field leveled off, institutions would recommend lenders based on borrower benefits and customer service. Fast forward to 2007, the idea of having a “preferred lender list” fell under great scrutiny, and rules changed so that financial aid offices were required to clearly articulate how they selected recommended lenders. The new regulations applied to federal student loan lenders as well as private or alternative student loan providers.

The plug has now been pulled on the 45-year-old Family Federal Education Loan Program and replaced by Direct Lending (DL) with the federal government serving as lender for federally backed student loans. So is the process of vetting educational lenders no longer necessary? Not when it comes to private education loans.

Unfortunately there is a great deal of misinformation and concomitantly great angst in financial aid offices regarding recommendations for private loan lenders. I recently attended a conference for college presidents and a feature consultant in a well attended session proclaimed that lender lists or guiding parents to lender choices was no longer legal! The problem is that this is simply not true. Private/alternative loans are a valuable and increasingly necessary tool for families as the gap between financial aid available from traditional sources and the actual cost of higher education grows.

One common theme over the last twelve months or so I have heard at higher education conferences is the necessity to mitigate the growth in tuition discounting.

The poor economy has forced reductions in state grant programs all over the country.

While we can expect modest increases in the Federal Pell Grant, the increases are not likely to keep pace with cuts in funding from the states and increases in tuition and fees.

The Obama administration was able to pass a bill making significant changes to the federal student loan program, but the provisions to increase funding were not included.

The availability of private loans has shrunk by about 10 BILLION dollars—approximately half of the capital available before the turmoil in the markets.

Home equity loans are no longer an option for many families.

Stock portfolio’s are down significantly.

Schools cannot afford to fill these gaps with additional tuition discounting.

How can enrollment managers better utilize private loans to enable their families to meet growing costs? A good start would be to get financial aid literacy tools to our admissions and financial aid offices so they can give guidance to prospective students and families.

Ironically, in times when families need financial guidance the most, the financial aid community plans on doing the least. According to Tim Ranzetta from Student Lending Analytics, 29% of financial aid offices plan on providing no recommendation lists for their students and families and 24% plan on throwing prospective students and families a list of all private lenders with no guidance. Imagine if a high school guidance counselor told a college-bound student “Here you go…” and handed the them the Higher Education Directory. Last according to Ranzetta, 30% of financial aid offices are not sure what they are going to do. So the question is why?

According to Ranzetta, the top two reasons for financial aid offices giving no guidance on private loans is concern about complying with new regulations and the time it takes to maintain the list. Fortunately, there are loan search engines that on average could save a student $4,000 in interest on a $10,000 loan. If you extrapolate that across your student body, the savings is huge. Would someone not digest the regulations or take the time to sort out choice if it meant a student getting a $4,000 Pell Grant?

The technology exists today where administrators can satisfy the new regulations with “in a box” solutions and there is no maintaining of a list—just finding reputable search links. Without guidance, students can make poor choices. Getting 12,000 choices on Google is only putting your students in harm’s way. More expensive private loans will only increase the probability that students will have to choose between paying their private loan or a federal loan upon graduation, driving up your school’s default rates.

All private loans are not created equal. By taking the time to research the best options for your students, you will be doing them a great service and assisting your institution in achieving desired recruitment and retentions goals. Proactive utilization of private and alternative loans can reduce discount rates as well. By leveraging new technologies you can eliminate some higher education blood, sweat, and tears. The bleeding of tuition discounts, the sweat  of finding reputable loan money for students and the tears of the prospective student who can’t attend the school of their dreams…. or worse yet, has to leave one.

January 7th, 2010

Re-Evaluate Policies During Trying Economic Times

John W. Dysart
President
The Dysart Group, Inc.

The economic downturn has had a direct impact at colleges and universities. In many cases, enrollments are stagnant or have declined. Financial aid costs have risen as increased unemployment and market drops have fueled growth in aggregate financial need for both new and returning students. Colleges are dealing with more financial need while simultaneously experiencing cuts in state financial aid. Often, institutional resources are scarce as returns on endowed investments have been disappointing. These conditions are likely to persist for at least the near future.

Keep reading →

January 6th, 2010

Commencement is a Beginning (Alumni Development, of Course!)

Douglas Spadaro, Ph.D.
President
Premier Communications

 

David Waggoner, M.A.
Vice President
Premier Communications


As graduation speakers often point out, commencement is a time of celebration and new beginnings. Administration, faculty and staff are happy about another job well done. Parents and families evidence pride in children and relatives. And, most importantly, new graduates exalt in their accomplishments and look forward to the future.

 

A significant aspect of this future is the ongoing lifetime relationship that graduates have with the college as alumni. From your perspective, commencement is the start of cultivating positive relationships with your alumni. Clearly college administrators want to make the most of this day of transition as young adults move from being accomplished students to being loyal benefactors.

 

In the spring of 2009, Premier was approached by one of our long-term clients with a unique challenge: Was there a way to utilize our specialized collegiate communications expertise and technologies to enhance a rather routine ritual – commencement? After much brainstorming, the client and our creative staff developed the novel idea of a personalized graduation announcement and invitation. This concept plays off the idea of the diploma. Each diploma is personalized, so why not carry this theme to the commencement announcement as well?

 

An example of the finished product can be seen below. We have incorporated personalization in three places in the announcement: The graduate’s name, the degree earned, and the college by which it is awarded. Each student received five personalized invitations and matching envelopes. These were mailed by Premier in a college envelope directly to the graduating students. Also included in the package was a letter from the college’s Provost congratulating graduates on their achievement. In addition, an editable version of the invitation was made available on the college’s website so that students could download it and create their own personalized invitations if more were needed. Finally a supply of generic invitations and matching envelopes were provided directly to the college registrar for last minute additions to the graduation roster.

 

Personalized Commencement Invitation

 

The results of this unique development effort were outstanding. The college received accolades from family, friends, and most importantly, new graduates - now alumni! Many of these new alumni framed the personalized invitations along with their diploma.

 

Providing graduates with personalized graduation announcements to be sent to family and friends is a small token of appreciation for their selection of your institution in the first place, and their perseverance in earning a college degree. It is a gesture that they will long remember as alumni. Above all, it’s an important step in the cultivating of a positive relationship with future donors!

 

Premier Communications is a strong proponent of variable data printing, and our technology enhances the image of those colleges and universities with whom we partner. Our print technology has reached the point where each piece coming off one of our high resolution printers can be unique. Of course personalized graduation announcements are only one application of this advanced technology, which includes personalized admissions postcards, personalized college flyers and brochures, personalized recruitment HTML e-mails, personalized development solicitations, and … (use your imagination!).

 

Premier believes that the application of personalized printing technology to the alumni development area offers our clients a unique opportunity to develop and maintain close, personal relationships with your most important benefactors. We urge all of our clients to take full advantage of commencement as the beginning of this life-long relationship.